For HR and People teams who need to keep roles sharp as everything changes

A vague job description becomes
an expensive conversation.

The line manager wants someone quickly. HR turns it into a vacancy. The candidate forms a picture. Months later it turns out that the role, behaviour, culture or growth were different from expectations. Then comes frustration, correction, sick leave, mediation or departure.

Pilot price €49
No subscription
Ready in 3 minutes
Directly usable for HR and line managers
Where it really goes wrong

The mismatch starts before anyone is hired or evaluated.

A line manager asks for "someone who is proactive". HR turns it into a professional vacancy. The candidate reads freedom, growth and trust. In practice, proactive sometimes means: little guidance, high pressure and unclear priorities. That is not a small communication problem. It becomes a conversation. Then another. And sometimes a formal case.

Line manager

The manager means something but doesn't say it sharply enough

"Proactive", "senior" and "fits the team" sound logical. They don't say what behaviour is needed when pressure builds or priorities conflict.

HR manager

The vacancy becomes attractive — sometimes too attractive

Culture, freedom and growth are written more beautifully or vaguely than they are in practice. HR has no choice: without sharp input, attractive is the only thing that remains.

Candidate

The gaps are filled in by the candidate

What is not concrete gets coloured in. About growth, guidance, autonomy, workload and the manager's style. Everyone applies for their own picture of the role.

HR manager again

The bill arrives at HR

Correction. Difficult conversations. Disappointment. Sick leave. Mediation. Departure. Hiring again. And HR has to explain why the process didn't work.

"An escalated employment conflict costs an average of €27,000 in direct internal costs. Behind long-term sick leave is often something else: miscommunication, distrust or clashing expectations."

Result ADR / Flow Practice for Law — employment mediation Netherlands 2025
The new reality for HR

Roles change faster than organisations can keep up.

AI, tight labour markets, sick leave, regulation, caregiving responsibilities, reorganisations and changing employee expectations all hit HR at the same time. Meanwhile line managers still need to hire, assess, guide and correct.

The old job profile — made once and forgotten for years — can no longer carry this. A job profile is valid for at most three years. And that is already a long time.

JobsGenerator makes the foundation quickly usable again. Per role. Per moment. Without an implementation project.
Recruitment and hard-to-fill vacancies
Rising sick leave and burnout
AI changing roles and expectations
Mediations and employment conflicts
Reorganisations and strategy changes
Pay transparency regulation (2026)
All these conversations ask the same thing: a current, shared picture of what the role requires. That foundation is missing in most organisations.
The JobsGenerator approach

From loose assumptions to one sharp role basis.

JobsGenerator translates role input into a coherent set: job profile, job posting, competencies, STAR questions and assessment criteria. That way HR, line manager and candidate work from the same foundation.

Without JobsGenerator
With JobsGenerator
Line manager delivers wishes and old postings
Structured role input via 4D method
HR writes an attractive job posting
Job profile with results, behaviour and criteria
Interview: experience, click and motivation
STAR questions on behaviour the role requires
Assessment: reinvented afterwards
Same expectation as at the moment of hire
Mediation: nobody knows what was agreed
Traceable role expectation set upfront
The 4D method
D
Goal
Why does this role exist?

A job profile without a goal is a task description. It describes what someone does but not why the role exists and which result counts.

Foundation
D
Domain
In what context does someone work?

Candidates who don't know the context can't honestly assess their own fit. Domain prevents disappointment after joining.

Context
D
Behaviour
What behaviour is expected?

Describing tasks selects on recognition. Describing behaviour selects on suitability. The difference lies in the question: what must someone demonstrate?

Behaviour
D
Drivers
Which competencies are critical?

Competency words without behavioural indicators are labels. Behavioural indicators say what someone does when it matters.

Competencies
📄

Job profile

Result areas, responsibilities, behavioural indicators and salary bandwidth.

Ready in 3 minutes
📢

Job posting

Attracts and filters, because the role is not made more attractive than it is.

Generated from the profile
🎯

Competency model

Not generic labels but concrete behaviour per role and level.

Role-specific generation
💬

STAR interview questions

Per competency, derived from behavioural indicators. Questions that measure what the role actually requires.

Per competency generated
📊

Assessment criteria

The same expectation returns after hiring. No new measuring stick invented six months later.

Connected to the profile
57%
of hires don't work out as expected
Thomas International via Werf& (2024) — 25% don't work out at all
42%
of voluntary turnover was preventable
Gallup — 45% of leavers had no proactive conversation in the three months before leaving
27k
direct costs per employment conflict
Result ADR — direct internal costs only; actual damage is higher
49
to break the cycle
Pilot price per job profile · no subscription · PDF immediately available

Prevent your next vacancy from ending in the same conversation.

First make clear what the role requires. Then the vacancy, the interview and the assessment.

Pilot price €49 No subscription PDF immediately available Mollie payment